Tea has a rich and varied history, but you’d be surprised at what a HUGE impact it had on the modern world. The book, ‘Thirst for Empire’ focuses on how tea was developed from an obscure commodity only available to the rich to a driver for imperial expansion and mass marketing that affects us to this very day.
The book starts off just as tea was becoming an important commodity and its primary source being from China. To the British, this became the opportunity to use their vast trade networks to control distribution and later production of this product. But because it was relatively unknown to the common person, markets and demand needed to be created.
Tea itself was a new beverage that competed with existing industries at the time, and because it was foreign was seen as a threat by some. So between domestic habits (i.e. beer) that may have been impacted or distrust of foreign goods, there were plenty of early critics, as evidenced by a popular writer below:
“Tea was an idle custom; an absurd expense, tending to create fantastic desires, and bad habits, which must render us less happy or more miserable than we should otherwise be”.
The Feminine Aspect
Part of tea culture became associated with women, initially because, although tea was sold in coffee houses, many women of means didn’t enter those overwhelmingly male establishments. Twinings was one of the first to recognize this and created tea specific stores nearby aimed at women.
But apart from this, the book shows how the tea house movement exploded in London particularly, and became a huge business.
Temperance Movements and Processed Food
Tea became the obvious choice for the rise of temperance movements in the 19th century. Shunning alcohol, these societies created lavish tea parties to attract new members; and offered all sorts of breads, cakes, butter, cream, fruit, and sugar. In a roundabout way, these movements with tea at its core contributed to a change in eating habits and dramatic increase in the consumption of sugar.
Globalism and Free Trade
As the 18th and 19th centuries progressed, globalism and world trade increased. Tea and other commodities like it were a source of major tax revenue. And these policies created friction, eventually leading the North American colonies to thumb their noses at tea. The Boston Tea party was a result, which led to harsher punitive measures by the crown, which led to armed revolt.
There was a point where the entire British navy was funded by the tax on tea; and the rise of the East India Company, a massive multinational company with implicit state support reigned supreme.
Establishing Food Standards
Tea also led to such conflicts as the opium wars: With the British supplying opium to China to counter the trade surplus that occurred with China. Later on, India was found to have some great growing regions and a movement of pacification and exploitation to convert countryside into tea plantations took place. As a result, there was a push to encourage the purchase of tea from these imperially-controlled areas, and charges of adulteration (some of it being true) of Chinese tea along with racist stories (i.e. Chinese tea contains the sweat of dirty plantation workers) to convert more British consumers to drinking “empire” tea.
It was the adulteration of tea–such as using food coloring to change a green tea into black–that led to a series of standards for inspection and certification, which became some of the first food safety laws.
Spread and Decline of Empire
Tea was also thought of as a way to pacify and civilize British empire subjects, from India to Africa. It was thought of as a way to impose British standards of civilization upon their subjects, whether they liked it or not. It is interesting how India resisted tea at first, then made tea their own by spicing it up, going against British norms.
Eventually there were nationalistic movements to support the empire and to persuade people to only buy tea with EMPIRE tea logos on it. This was particularly emphasized in the beginning of the 20th century and during World War 1.
During the post-World War 1 depression, tea became the subject of commercial campaigns, with professional organizations funded by growers to market and advertise tea not only in Britain, but her colonies. Here we saw massive consumer relation campaigns with cartoon characters like “Mr. Pott” to push the mantra of “tea revives you.”
During World War 2, tea became a comfort while the world was in flames, with a cup of tea giving the British the ‘keep calm and carry on’ attitude during the Blitz and offering comforts of home to soldiers fighting thousands of miles from home.
The end of the book deals with the decline of tea after the war. With the British empire effectively dismantled, the United States was now the global superpower, and with it, American products and marketing flooded the world.
Where tea was a staple, the familiar Coca Cola signs sprung up. Mass market soft drink and, hip coffee bars all took a toll on tea consumption, as did the geopolitical disruptions in the former colonies affect production.
Summary
This book is a very detailed historic account of how the business of tea affected all aspects of the world socially, economically, and militarily. And while there are enormous amounts of details to sift through, those who are fond of tea will especially appreciate the numerous side stories of this important beverage. Peppered throughout are photos, and the early marketing slogans and advertisements are especially interesting. A great addition to any library, and pairs well with tea!
I’m always fascinated by the history of tea. I’ll be writing a post about the role that tea is playing in our culture at this point in time. Check it out tomorrow. I think you’ll find it to be interesting.
Michelle, I hope you will also look into this as others here might, including Elyse Petersen, regarding ethics in the industry. It was sad to read this re: abuses of tea workers “Some of the worst cases of exploitation documented within our research occurred on ethically certified plantations.”
Does this mean Fair Trade certified plantations?
https://phys.org/news/2018-05-labour-exploitation-endemic-global-tea.html#jCp
I’ve mentioned before how labels are very misleading. The tricks used remind me of WW2 POW camps made to look humane in front of red cross inspectors. You can pile up as many certifications and regulations as you want, it will not stop bad behavior. My question is why aren’t they calling out companies or people by name?
The tricks used remind me of WW2 POW camps made to look humane in front of red cross inspectors. You can pile up as many certifications and regulations as you want, it will not stop bad behavior. My question is why aren’t they calling out companies or people by name?
Kevin, look at what’s happening right now with how the huge international retailing companies are hurting farmers they”ve been working with for years, for example dairy farmers, by setting up their own facilities. The ‘bottom line’ is cruel many times, isn’t it????
And my point is whatever happened to journalism? There was that controversy over foxconn a few years back, but this is the type of stuff the media should be reporting about and exposing. Just look at any major news network website and see what they cover.
I have to agree that journalists aren’t doing enough in general. Yes, a handful have been unveiling lots of significant information but the rest, they’re not looking under every rock to shine a light on the truth. They support their party and that’s it. It’s unconscionable. They need to be Americans first and foremost, not putting their party affiliation over citizens. History will not look favorably over these times.